5dd8b3e29bb93f428917447c144cc7a5b2133205
Home.md
| ... | ... | @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ |
| 27 | 27 | |
| 28 | 28 | - [[circuits-dat]] - [[logic-dat]] - [[logic-gate-dat]] - [[buffer-dat]] |
| 29 | 29 | |
| 30 | -- [[mechanics-dat]] - [[materials-dat]] - [[tools-dat]] - [[mechanical-tools-dat]] |
|
| 30 | +- [[mechanics-dat]] - [[materials-dat]] - [[tools-dat]] - [[mechanical-tools-dat]] - [[engineering-dat]] |
|
| 31 | 31 | |
| 32 | 32 | - [[BOM-DAT]] - [[case-dat]] - [[CONN-dat]] - [[BTB-dat]] - [[transistor-dat]] - [[diode-dat]] - [[resistor-dat]] - [[mosfet-dat]] |
| 33 | 33 |
materials-dat/materials-dat.md
| ... | ... | @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 12 | - [[coating-dat]] - [[thermal-insulation-coating-dat]] |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | +- [[oil-dat]] - [[oil-mineral-dat]] |
|
| 15 | + |
|
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 17 | ## ref |
| 16 | 18 |
materials-dat/oil-dat/oil-cutting-dat/oil-cutting-dat.md
| ... | ... | @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ |
| 1 | + |
|
| 2 | +# oil-cutting-dat |
|
| 3 | + |
|
| 4 | +## 切削液(Cutting Fluid / Metalworking Fluid)的用途与种类 |
|
| 5 | + |
|
| 6 | +--- |
|
| 7 | + |
|
| 8 | +## 一、切削液的主要用途(What is it used for) |
|
| 9 | + |
|
| 10 | +### 1️⃣ 冷却(Cooling) |
|
| 11 | +- 带走切削区热量 |
|
| 12 | +- 防止工件烧蓝、变形 |
|
| 13 | +- 延长刀具寿命 |
|
| 14 | + |
|
| 15 | +### 2️⃣ 润滑(Lubrication) |
|
| 16 | +- 降低刀具与工件摩擦 |
|
| 17 | +- 减少粘刀、积屑瘤 |
|
| 18 | +- 改善表面光洁度 |
|
| 19 | + |
|
| 20 | +### 3️⃣ 排屑与清洗(Chip removal & Cleaning) |
|
| 21 | +- 冲走切屑 |
|
| 22 | +- 防止切屑二次划伤 |
|
| 23 | +- 保持加工区清洁 |
|
| 24 | + |
|
| 25 | +### 4️⃣ 防锈防腐(Corrosion protection) |
|
| 26 | +- 防止机床、工件生锈 |
|
| 27 | +- 对停机或存放尤为重要 |
|
| 28 | + |
|
| 29 | +--- |
|
| 30 | + |
|
| 31 | +## 二、切削液的主要种类(Types of cutting fluids) |
|
| 32 | + |
|
| 33 | +### 1️⃣ 油基切削液(Oil-based Cutting Fluid) |
|
| 34 | +**英文**:Cutting oil |
|
| 35 | + |
|
| 36 | +**特点** |
|
| 37 | +- 润滑性最好 |
|
| 38 | +- 冷却能力较弱 |
|
| 39 | +- 不易挥发 |
|
| 40 | + |
|
| 41 | +**适用** |
|
| 42 | +- 攻丝、拉削、深孔钻 |
|
| 43 | +- 不锈钢、合金钢 |
|
| 44 | + |
|
| 45 | +**缺点** |
|
| 46 | +- 易产生油雾 |
|
| 47 | +- 清洁性差 |
|
| 48 | + |
|
| 49 | +--- |
|
| 50 | + |
|
| 51 | +### 2️⃣ 乳化型切削液(Emulsion / Soluble oil) |
|
| 52 | +**英文**:Emulsion cutting fluid |
|
| 53 | + |
|
| 54 | +**特点** |
|
| 55 | +- 油 + 水(乳白色) |
|
| 56 | +- 冷却和润滑平衡 |
|
| 57 | +- 成本低 |
|
| 58 | + |
|
| 59 | +**适用** |
|
| 60 | +- 车削、铣削、钻孔 |
|
| 61 | +- 碳钢、铸铁、铝合金 |
|
| 62 | + |
|
| 63 | +**缺点** |
|
| 64 | +- 需定期维护 |
|
| 65 | +- 易滋生细菌 |
|
| 66 | + |
|
| 67 | +--- |
|
| 68 | + |
|
| 69 | +### 3️⃣ 半合成切削液(Semi-synthetic) |
|
| 70 | +**英文**:Semi-synthetic cutting fluid |
|
| 71 | + |
|
| 72 | +**特点** |
|
| 73 | +- 少量矿物油 + 合成成分 |
|
| 74 | +- 冷却性好,清洁度高 |
|
| 75 | +- 气味小 |
|
| 76 | + |
|
| 77 | +**适用** |
|
| 78 | +- CNC 加工 |
|
| 79 | +- 多材料混合加工 |
|
| 80 | + |
|
| 81 | +--- |
|
| 82 | + |
|
| 83 | +### 4️⃣ 全合成切削液(Synthetic cutting fluid) |
|
| 84 | +**英文**:Synthetic cutting fluid |
|
| 85 | + |
|
| 86 | +**特点** |
|
| 87 | +- 不含矿物油(透明) |
|
| 88 | +- 冷却性能最好 |
|
| 89 | +- 清洁、环保 |
|
| 90 | + |
|
| 91 | +**适用** |
|
| 92 | +- 高速切削 |
|
| 93 | +- 磨削、不锈钢、铝 |
|
| 94 | + |
|
| 95 | +**缺点** |
|
| 96 | +- 润滑性不如油基 |
|
| 97 | + |
|
| 98 | +--- |
|
| 99 | + |
|
| 100 | +### 5️⃣ 极压切削液(EP cutting fluid) |
|
| 101 | +**英文**:Extreme-pressure cutting fluid |
|
| 102 | + |
|
| 103 | +**特点** |
|
| 104 | +- 含硫、磷、氯极压添加剂 |
|
| 105 | +- 抗高负载能力强 |
|
| 106 | + |
|
| 107 | +**适用** |
|
| 108 | +- 攻丝、拉削、齿轮加工 |
|
| 109 | +- 高强度钢、不锈钢 |
|
| 110 | + |
|
| 111 | +⚠️ **注意** |
|
| 112 | +- 含氯产品对某些材料(如钛)不友好 |
|
| 113 | + |
|
| 114 | +--- |
|
| 115 | + |
|
| 116 | +## 三、按使用方式分类 |
|
| 117 | + |
|
| 118 | +| 类型 | 英文 | 说明 | |
|
| 119 | +|----|----|----| |
|
| 120 | +| 浇注式 | Flood cooling | 大量冷却 | |
|
| 121 | +| 喷雾式 | Mist cooling | 用量少 | |
|
| 122 | +| 微量润滑 | MQL | 少量高效 | |
|
| 123 | +| 干切 | Dry cutting | 无切削液 | |
|
| 124 | + |
|
| 125 | +--- |
|
| 126 | + |
|
| 127 | +## 四、简单选用建议 |
|
| 128 | + |
|
| 129 | +- **不锈钢 / 攻丝** → 油基 / 极压切削液 |
|
| 130 | +- **铝合金** → 乳化型 / 全合成 |
|
| 131 | +- **高速加工 / 磨削** → 全合成 |
|
| 132 | +- **普通钢** → 乳化型 |
|
| 133 | + |
|
| 134 | +--- |
|
| 135 | + |
|
| 136 | +## 一句话总结 |
|
| 137 | +> **冷却靠水,润滑靠油,重载靠极压** |
|
| 138 | + |
|
| 139 | + |
|
| 140 | + |
|
| 141 | +## ref |
|
| 142 | + |
|
| 143 | +- [[oil-dat]] |
|
| ... | ... | \ No newline at end of file |
materials-dat/oil-dat/oil-dat.md
| ... | ... | @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ |
| 1 | + |
|
| 2 | +# oil-dat |
|
| 3 | + |
|
| 4 | +- [[oil-mineral-dat]] |
|
| ... | ... | \ No newline at end of file |
materials-dat/oil-dat/oil-mineral-dat/oil-mineral-dat.md
| ... | ... | @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@ |
| 1 | + |
|
| 2 | + |
|
| 3 | +# oil-mineral-dat.md |
|
| 4 | + |
|
| 5 | +- [[oil-soaking-dat]] |
|
| 6 | + |
|
| 7 | + |
|
| 8 | +## Mineral Oil vs Air: Thermal Conductivity & Cooling Performance Comparison |
|
| 9 | + |
|
| 10 | +### 1. Thermal Conductivity (W/m·K) |
|
| 11 | +| Medium | Thermal Conductivity | Meaning | |
|
| 12 | +|---------------|----------------------|---------| |
|
| 13 | +| **Air** | ~0.024 | Very low heat transfer | |
|
| 14 | +| **Mineral Oil** | ~0.12–0.15 | About 5–6× better than air | |
|
| 15 | + |
|
| 16 | +**Conclusion:** |
|
| 17 | +Mineral oil transfers heat better than air *through direct conduction*. |
|
| 18 | + |
|
| 19 | +--- |
|
| 20 | + |
|
| 21 | +### 2. Heat Capacity (kJ/kg·K) |
|
| 22 | +| Medium | Heat Capacity | Meaning | |
|
| 23 | +|---------------|---------------|---------| |
|
| 24 | +| **Air** | ~1.0 | Low heat storage | |
|
| 25 | +| **Mineral Oil** | ~1.6–2.0 | Can absorb more heat per unit mass | |
|
| 26 | + |
|
| 27 | +**Conclusion:** |
|
| 28 | +Mineral oil absorbs more heat before increasing temperature. |
|
| 29 | + |
|
| 30 | +--- |
|
| 31 | + |
|
| 32 | +### 3. Convection (Cooling by Moving Fluid) |
|
| 33 | +#### Air |
|
| 34 | +- Very low viscosity → moves easily |
|
| 35 | +- Natural convection is strong |
|
| 36 | +- Fans blow heat away efficiently |
|
| 37 | +**Air = Good for passive cooling** |
|
| 38 | + |
|
| 39 | +#### Mineral Oil |
|
| 40 | +- High viscosity → moves slowly |
|
| 41 | +- Natural convection is weak |
|
| 42 | +- If not pumped, heat accumulates near the chip |
|
| 43 | +**Oil = Poor natural convection unless circulated** |
|
| 44 | + |
|
| 45 | +--- |
|
| 46 | + |
|
| 47 | +### 4. Real-World Cooling Performance |
|
| 48 | + |
|
| 49 | +#### With active flow (fan/pump) |
|
| 50 | +**Mineral Oil > Air** |
|
| 51 | +- Lower operating temperature |
|
| 52 | +- Used in oil-cooled servers & transformers |
|
| 53 | + |
|
| 54 | +#### With no movement (sealed container) |
|
| 55 | +**Mineral Oil < Air** |
|
| 56 | +- Heat gets trapped around components |
|
| 57 | +- Components overheat in small electronics |
|
| 58 | +- Can cause long-term damage to chips & capacitors |
|
| 59 | + |
|
| 60 | +--- |
|
| 61 | + |
|
| 62 | +### 5. Final Conclusions |
|
| 63 | + |
|
| 64 | +- **For passive cooling:** |
|
| 65 | + Air cools better because it convects well. |
|
| 66 | + |
|
| 67 | +- **For active cooling (oil pump or circulation):** |
|
| 68 | + Mineral oil cools better due to superior conduction & heat absorption. |
|
| 69 | + |
|
| 70 | +- **For small electronics in still oil:** |
|
| 71 | + Mineral oil can **cause overheating**, because heat cannot escape from the local area. |
|
| 72 | + |
|
| 73 | + |
|
| 74 | +## cool |
|
| 75 | + |
|
| 76 | +### Can a Normal Computer Fan Run in Mineral Oil? |
|
| 77 | + |
|
| 78 | +#### ✅ 1. Yes, a standard PC fan can operate in mineral oil |
|
| 79 | +- Mineral oil is **non-conductive** → does not short-circuit electronics. |
|
| 80 | +- Many hobbyists run **oil-submerged PCs** with normal fans. |
|
| 81 | +- Brushless DC fans generally continue spinning fine in oil. |
|
| 82 | + |
|
| 83 | +--- |
|
| 84 | + |
|
| 85 | +#### ⚠️ 2. BUT: The fan's **speed will decrease a lot** |
|
| 86 | +Reason: |
|
| 87 | +- Oil is ~800× denser than air. |
|
| 88 | +- The blades have to "push" thick oil → heavy resistance. |
|
| 89 | + |
|
| 90 | +Typical results: |
|
| 91 | +- A 120 mm fan normally spins at 1200–2000 RPM in air. |
|
| 92 | +- In mineral oil, it may drop to **100–300 RPM** (or even stall). |
|
| 93 | + |
|
| 94 | +So it *moves oil*, but **slowly**. |
|
| 95 | + |
|
| 96 | +--- |
|
| 97 | + |
|
| 98 | +#### ⚠️ 3. Fan lifespan will be shorter |
|
| 99 | +Problems you may encounter: |
|
| 100 | +- Motor works harder → more heat. |
|
| 101 | +- Oil may seep into bearings → increase friction. |
|
| 102 | +- Rubber seals may swell over time. |
|
| 103 | + |
|
| 104 | +It may still last **months to years**, but not as long as in air. |
|
| 105 | + |
|
| 106 | +--- |
|
| 107 | + |
|
| 108 | +#### ⚠️ 4. The fan moves OIL, not AIR |
|
| 109 | +In oil: |
|
| 110 | +- No airflow. |
|
| 111 | +- Instead you get **liquid circulation**, which is good for cooling. |
|
| 112 | + |
|
| 113 | +But: |
|
| 114 | +- Movement is much slower. |
|
| 115 | +- Large fans are more effective than small ones. |
|
| 116 | + |
|
| 117 | + |
|
| 118 | +## ref |
|
| 119 | + |
|
| 120 | +- [[mechanics-dat]] |
|
| ... | ... | \ No newline at end of file |
mechanics-dat/mechanics-dat.md
| ... | ... | @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 4 | - [[fab-dat]] - [[case-dat]] |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | +- [[engineering-dat]] |
|
| 7 | + |
|
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 9 | - [[Rivet-dat]] - [[Expansion-bolt-dat]] |
| 8 | 10 |
mechanics-dat/oil-mineral-dat/oil-mineral-dat.md
| ... | ... | @@ -1,120 +0,0 @@ |
| 1 | - |
|
| 2 | - |
|
| 3 | -# oil-mineral-dat.md |
|
| 4 | - |
|
| 5 | -- [[oil-soaking-dat]] |
|
| 6 | - |
|
| 7 | - |
|
| 8 | -## Mineral Oil vs Air: Thermal Conductivity & Cooling Performance Comparison |
|
| 9 | - |
|
| 10 | -### 1. Thermal Conductivity (W/m·K) |
|
| 11 | -| Medium | Thermal Conductivity | Meaning | |
|
| 12 | -|---------------|----------------------|---------| |
|
| 13 | -| **Air** | ~0.024 | Very low heat transfer | |
|
| 14 | -| **Mineral Oil** | ~0.12–0.15 | About 5–6× better than air | |
|
| 15 | - |
|
| 16 | -**Conclusion:** |
|
| 17 | -Mineral oil transfers heat better than air *through direct conduction*. |
|
| 18 | - |
|
| 19 | ---- |
|
| 20 | - |
|
| 21 | -### 2. Heat Capacity (kJ/kg·K) |
|
| 22 | -| Medium | Heat Capacity | Meaning | |
|
| 23 | -|---------------|---------------|---------| |
|
| 24 | -| **Air** | ~1.0 | Low heat storage | |
|
| 25 | -| **Mineral Oil** | ~1.6–2.0 | Can absorb more heat per unit mass | |
|
| 26 | - |
|
| 27 | -**Conclusion:** |
|
| 28 | -Mineral oil absorbs more heat before increasing temperature. |
|
| 29 | - |
|
| 30 | ---- |
|
| 31 | - |
|
| 32 | -### 3. Convection (Cooling by Moving Fluid) |
|
| 33 | -#### Air |
|
| 34 | -- Very low viscosity → moves easily |
|
| 35 | -- Natural convection is strong |
|
| 36 | -- Fans blow heat away efficiently |
|
| 37 | -**Air = Good for passive cooling** |
|
| 38 | - |
|
| 39 | -#### Mineral Oil |
|
| 40 | -- High viscosity → moves slowly |
|
| 41 | -- Natural convection is weak |
|
| 42 | -- If not pumped, heat accumulates near the chip |
|
| 43 | -**Oil = Poor natural convection unless circulated** |
|
| 44 | - |
|
| 45 | ---- |
|
| 46 | - |
|
| 47 | -### 4. Real-World Cooling Performance |
|
| 48 | - |
|
| 49 | -#### With active flow (fan/pump) |
|
| 50 | -**Mineral Oil > Air** |
|
| 51 | -- Lower operating temperature |
|
| 52 | -- Used in oil-cooled servers & transformers |
|
| 53 | - |
|
| 54 | -#### With no movement (sealed container) |
|
| 55 | -**Mineral Oil < Air** |
|
| 56 | -- Heat gets trapped around components |
|
| 57 | -- Components overheat in small electronics |
|
| 58 | -- Can cause long-term damage to chips & capacitors |
|
| 59 | - |
|
| 60 | ---- |
|
| 61 | - |
|
| 62 | -### 5. Final Conclusions |
|
| 63 | - |
|
| 64 | -- **For passive cooling:** |
|
| 65 | - Air cools better because it convects well. |
|
| 66 | - |
|
| 67 | -- **For active cooling (oil pump or circulation):** |
|
| 68 | - Mineral oil cools better due to superior conduction & heat absorption. |
|
| 69 | - |
|
| 70 | -- **For small electronics in still oil:** |
|
| 71 | - Mineral oil can **cause overheating**, because heat cannot escape from the local area. |
|
| 72 | - |
|
| 73 | - |
|
| 74 | -## cool |
|
| 75 | - |
|
| 76 | -### Can a Normal Computer Fan Run in Mineral Oil? |
|
| 77 | - |
|
| 78 | -#### ✅ 1. Yes, a standard PC fan can operate in mineral oil |
|
| 79 | -- Mineral oil is **non-conductive** → does not short-circuit electronics. |
|
| 80 | -- Many hobbyists run **oil-submerged PCs** with normal fans. |
|
| 81 | -- Brushless DC fans generally continue spinning fine in oil. |
|
| 82 | - |
|
| 83 | ---- |
|
| 84 | - |
|
| 85 | -#### ⚠️ 2. BUT: The fan's **speed will decrease a lot** |
|
| 86 | -Reason: |
|
| 87 | -- Oil is ~800× denser than air. |
|
| 88 | -- The blades have to "push" thick oil → heavy resistance. |
|
| 89 | - |
|
| 90 | -Typical results: |
|
| 91 | -- A 120 mm fan normally spins at 1200–2000 RPM in air. |
|
| 92 | -- In mineral oil, it may drop to **100–300 RPM** (or even stall). |
|
| 93 | - |
|
| 94 | -So it *moves oil*, but **slowly**. |
|
| 95 | - |
|
| 96 | ---- |
|
| 97 | - |
|
| 98 | -#### ⚠️ 3. Fan lifespan will be shorter |
|
| 99 | -Problems you may encounter: |
|
| 100 | -- Motor works harder → more heat. |
|
| 101 | -- Oil may seep into bearings → increase friction. |
|
| 102 | -- Rubber seals may swell over time. |
|
| 103 | - |
|
| 104 | -It may still last **months to years**, but not as long as in air. |
|
| 105 | - |
|
| 106 | ---- |
|
| 107 | - |
|
| 108 | -#### ⚠️ 4. The fan moves OIL, not AIR |
|
| 109 | -In oil: |
|
| 110 | -- No airflow. |
|
| 111 | -- Instead you get **liquid circulation**, which is good for cooling. |
|
| 112 | - |
|
| 113 | -But: |
|
| 114 | -- Movement is much slower. |
|
| 115 | -- Large fans are more effective than small ones. |
|
| 116 | - |
|
| 117 | - |
|
| 118 | -## ref |
|
| 119 | - |
|
| 120 | -- [[mechanics-dat]] |
|
| ... | ... | \ No newline at end of file |